I'm wondering, (ready to accept it's just me) , do the petty little things about refractors like metal vs. plastic focus knobs, wood vs, metal tripod legs, and glue on stickers vs engraved or metal badges affect how you feel about your classic refractor?
In my collection Sears (Royal Astro Optical), went glue-on (1970?), Monolux plastered stickers on everything in the kit!. I think all the Towa (circle T) were stickers. Even Hino/Mizar are stuck. The earlier, but not exclusively refractors had, (to me), the more appealing metal or engraved focusers. Nippon Kogaku, early Goto, most RA scopes (even rebranded by Tasco), Swift comes to mind. Contrary to just vintage my Takahashi FS102 has a "real" badge with metal focus knobs (circa 1998).
And then there are the focus knobs. When possible I've swapped out metal for those wide plastic knobs in the later made scopes that I've collected. I have a 1960'ish Nippon Kogaku that has nylon-esq knobs. what were they thinking?? Goto used quite a bit of Bakelite but I've made an exception and embrace it. A Goto idiosyncrasy? I do understand the logic if you are inclined to lick a focus knob on a brutally cold night you probably would prefer plastic
Tripod legs being made of wood just add to the allure. Glass, metal, wood. That makes a good telescope! A wood cabinet is super nice too, not that I'd carry it around like a suitcase. K-chink, ka-chunk, k-chink!
In my case I enjoy telescopes just being more often than the few nights just seeing... through.
Rambling-musing on a Sunday night.