Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

What's the most underrated eyepiece you've owned?

  • Please log in to reply
149 replies to this topic

#1 Rick-T137

Rick-T137

    Gemini

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,179
  • Joined: 28 Feb 2015
  • Loc: Canada

Posted 01 March 2025 - 09:52 AM

I've owned a lot of inexpensive and relatively inexpensive gear in my day, but one eyepiece that jumps to my mind when I think of "underrated" is my 8mm Tele Vue Plössl. It is a much maligned eyepiece for its short eye relief (6 mm) but for me it is a wonderful eyepiece. I can acquire the exit pupil easily and see the whole 50° field. With my 8" SCT it provide about 250x which on most nights here is the max I can coax out of my SCT (although I've had it up over 500x on good nights!).

 

I know the TV Plössls have a good reputation - especially amongst planetary observers. So in this regard, I think where the 8mm is underrated is related to how easy it is to use. Compared to regular 6mm or 9mm Plössls I find the Tele Vue a step up in both quality and ease of use. Many people won't go near a Plössl eyepiece that is less than 15mm in focal length. And I know that tolerance for eye relief is a very personal thing - my tolerance is very high apparently.

 

Anyway, cheers to the TV 8mm Plössl and all the wonderful views it provides me.

 

sml_gallery_241096_18697_12288.jpg

 

Do you have an eyepiece (or eyepieces) that surprises you? It could be expensive or cheap (or in between) but just has a quality that was unexpected or performs in a way better than expected.

 

Clear skies!

 

Rick


  • Don25, turtle86, Lagrange and 8 others like this

#2 Chris MN

Chris MN

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 334
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2011
  • Loc: Cedar, MN

Posted 01 March 2025 - 10:21 AM

For a single eyepiece, my Meade Series 2 MA 25mm.  This eyepiece does surprisingly well with my C11.  

 

I have always liked my Meade Series 2 Ortho's.  The Meade Reseach Grade line is well known and are excellent eyepieces but the Series 2 ortho's are very, very close to the RG line.  At least in my C11.  

Attached Thumbnails

  • Meade MA 25mm.JPG
  • Meade Series 2 Ortho.JPG

Edited by Chris MN, 01 March 2025 - 11:14 AM.

  • Rick-T137, tcifani and 25585 like this

#3 Rick-T137

Rick-T137

    Gemini

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 3,179
  • Joined: 28 Feb 2015
  • Loc: Canada

Posted 01 March 2025 - 10:31 AM

For a single eyepiece, my Meade MA 25mm.  This eyepiece does surprisingly well with my C11.  

 

I have always liked my Meade Series 2 Ortho's.  The Meade Reseach Grade line is well known and are excellent eyepieces but the Series 2 ortho's are very, very close to the RG line.  At least in my C11.  

I would agree! I've owned a set of Meade Series II MA eyepieces, and honestly they perform better than I thought they would as well. They present a cooler tone than my TV Plössls do, but they are plenty sharp on axis. I only have the 25mm and 9mm these days (to go with my 2080 LX3 as the "stock" eyepieces) but I never really use them.

 

Maybe I should break 'em out tonight if the skies are clear! Thank you for sharing your awesome eyepieces.



#4 Sandy Swede

Sandy Swede

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,228
  • Joined: 23 Feb 2018
  • Loc: Delaware beaches

Posted 01 March 2025 - 10:59 AM

1. Most KK Fujiyama psudo-masuyamas.

2. Most Baader Classic orthos


  • jimandlaura26, Rick-T137 and radiofm74 like this

#5 25585

25585

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 25,580
  • Joined: 29 Aug 2017
  • Loc: In a valley, in the SW UK. 51°N

Posted 01 March 2025 - 11:07 AM

Where to start?

 

For 2" fit my 31mm Celestron Axiom LX. At F5 it is as good optically as a 31 Nagler I find. Also my 40mm Rodenstock Erfle, which gives really easy immersive views. Finally my 48mm Brandon, which with the right telescope has a true floating effect.

 

For 1.25" fit, more to consider. 14mm Morpheus, a great eyepiece that gets passed over due to its FL more than any other reason. Takahashi 28mm Erfle and Nikon NAV SW 17.5 eyepieces, both neat enough for binoviewing.


  • Rick-T137, ABQJeff and f18dad like this

#6 cimar

cimar

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 13 Nov 2018
  • Loc: California & Germany

Posted 01 March 2025 - 11:08 AM

Baader 31mm Aspheric

BCO 10mm for planetary with barlow

Lunt Zoom for planetary with barlow

UWA eyepieces from AT and other brands for BTs


  • Rick-T137 likes this

#7 Jim R

Jim R

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 665
  • Joined: 20 Jul 2017

Posted 01 March 2025 - 11:20 AM

TV Radian 14mm


  • Kutno and Rick-T137 like this

#8 Shoestring Astronomy

Shoestring Astronomy

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Vendors
  • Posts: 96
  • Joined: 22 Dec 2024

Posted 01 March 2025 - 11:37 AM

Explore Scientific 30mm 2" 80 deg.


  • BKBrown, dave253, Rick-T137 and 2 others like this

#9 RAKing

RAKing

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10,908
  • Joined: 28 Dec 2007
  • Loc: Northern VA - West of the D.C. Nebula

Posted 01 March 2025 - 01:24 PM

Televue 11T6 Naglers. 

 

I don't know why people didn't buy these, but they are just as indispensable in my binoviewer as the 24mm Pans.

 

Ron


  • Jacques, rdjamieson, turtle86 and 6 others like this

#10 izar187

izar187

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,419
  • Joined: 02 Sep 2006
  • Loc: 43N

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:02 PM

Siebert Ultra's, in particular the six element ones.


  • Rick-T137 likes this

#11 Refractor6

Refractor6

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,887
  • Joined: 20 Oct 2004
  • Loc: Port Alberni B.C. , Canada

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:08 PM

 Speers-Waler Series 1 7.4mm ep in my case I still own.

 

Back in the day local observers were fighting to get their hands on these when the various first up series 1 models hit the market from Antares {Sky Instruments}...or in my case at the time the nearby to the source long gone telescope shop.

 

 Don't hear much about them anymore but those who have certainly hold onto them.


  • izar187, Rick-T137 and therealdmt like this

#12 fftulip

fftulip

    Mariner 2

  • *****
  • Posts: 250
  • Joined: 17 Mar 2017
  • Loc: Southern California

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:17 PM

This is a bit out of left field, but the most surprising eyepiece I've ever owned is actually a Bausch & Lomb 15X (about 16.8mm f.l.) "Ultra W.F." microscope eyepiece.

It has a B&L part number of 31.15.74 and I believe was made for their Stereozoom microscopes, starting in the late 1970's or early 1980's (my guess).

The history is a bit convoluted because in 1987 B&L's microscope division was merged into Cambridge Instruments and in 1990 they were merged into Leica.

This was about the time, or possibly before, when Al Nagler introduced his revolutionary ultra wide angle eyepiece.

You can find this eyepiece under various labels besides B&L (Cambridge, Leica, ...), often for bargain prices on the used market (I think I bought mine for well under $100).

What's Unique about this eyepiece (for its time, now it's commonplace) is that it incorporates a Smyth lens, in this case incredibly thick (see picture) for both a wide field and long eye relief.

I'm guessing that the extreme thickness of the Smyth lens is due to the small 24.5mm diameter of the microscope standard and the need to relay the image to the larger eye lenses.

Of course it needs an adapter for use in a telescope.  I haven't made a rigorous test of this B&L eyepiece but my estimates of its specifications are:

 

focal length: 16.8mm

AFOV: 65 to 70 degrees

eye relief: 19-20mm

 

It works quite well in telescopes even at short focal ratios.  I think I do see some noticeable lateral color error, otherwise it's a great performing eyepiece and is good for binoviewing (it's quite compact).

 

 

Attached Thumbnails

  • BLuwf.jpg
  • BLuwep.jpg

  • abe, Rick-T137, therealdmt and 3 others like this

#13 sevenofnine

sevenofnine

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8,449
  • Joined: 16 Apr 2016
  • Loc: Santa Rosa, California 38*N., 122*W.

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:18 PM

SVB 7-21mm zoom for me. I read decent forum comments but at $50 my expectations were very low waytogo.gif


  • Rick-T137, therealdmt, Researcher and 1 other like this

#14 chemisted

chemisted

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,221
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2012

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:18 PM

I'd have to say my Celestron Axiom 40 mm 2" eyepiece.  They apparently didn't sell well, and I picked up mine new when they were being closed out at half price.  I did it on a lark as I already had a Panoptic 35 mm in the stable.  Here we are decades later and I still revere the Axiom while the Panoptic has moved on to another happy home.


Edited by chemisted, 01 March 2025 - 02:22 PM.

  • Corky, Rick-T137 and 25585 like this

#15 Jon Isaacs

Jon Isaacs

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 119,558
  • Joined: 16 Jun 2004
  • Loc: San Diego and Boulevard, CA

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:30 PM

Explore Scientific 30mm 2" 80 deg.

 

I'm not sure how these can be considered "under rated" For as long as they've been around it seems to me they've been "rated" as providing "near 31 mm Nagler performance but at a more affordable price.

 

That's what I saw when I compared them.

 

Jon


  • JayinUT, BKBrown, dave253 and 4 others like this

#16 Inkie

Inkie

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,154
  • Joined: 14 Dec 2022

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:35 PM

I used my ES 8.5mm for the first time about five weeks ago and was very pleasantly surprised at how nicely it showed Jupiter. I don't recall ever seeing it mentioned in all the hundreds of threads and posts I have been reading since joining two-plus years ago.  In this case, it was in a probably-forgiving-longer-focal-length OTA, it being my Celestron 127mm Mak.


  • Rick-T137 and therealdmt like this

#17 areyoukiddingme

areyoukiddingme

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 11,117
  • Joined: 18 Nov 2012

Posted 01 March 2025 - 02:37 PM

Meade 26mm super plossls. I used a pair of them in a binoviewer in my 11" Edgehd for the best view I ever got of Jupiter.

 

They are also comfortable, as I am able to smoosh my eye balls into the cups for a good fit.

 

Gave them away when I sold my William Optic binoviewer.


  • chemisted, Rick-T137 and AstroBoyInTheCity like this

#18 Corky

Corky

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 818
  • Joined: 22 Apr 2008
  • Loc: Ohio, USA

Posted 01 March 2025 - 04:17 PM

My Celestrom Axiom LX 10mm and 15mm eyepieces (uncloaked, as their chunky width makes them fit perfectly into my eye socket, leaving just the right amount of eye relief).
Those aluminum shrouds look and feel beautiful, but its the optics that really shine. Never any kidney beaning with the entire field of view instantly available with the greatest of ease.
A few months after buying these, I couldn't resist pushing the boat out for a TV Nagler 17mm, but after careful nightly comparisons over several months, I reluctantly admitted to myself that the Axiom worked better for me, so I sadly sold the TV.

Edited by Corky, 02 March 2025 - 05:22 AM.

  • Rick-T137 and 25585 like this

#19 bobhen

bobhen

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • Posts: 8,840
  • Joined: 25 Jun 2005

Posted 01 March 2025 - 04:22 PM

TV Radians. 

 

As newer models like the Delites came out, the Radians seemed to garner some negativity. And sure, the Delites have better edge performance are lighter and have a better eye guard. But if you can put up with those slight negatives, the Radians offer 20mm of ER, excellent centerfield sharpness, good ergonomics and can be had on the used marker at half the price of a Delite.
 
I have the 3mm, 4mm and 6mm Radians. I also have 6 Delites. I'm in no hurry to sell the Radians.

 

Bob


  • RichD, george tatsis, Kutno and 2 others like this

#20 Chris MN

Chris MN

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 334
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2011
  • Loc: Cedar, MN

Posted 01 March 2025 - 04:32 PM

Televue 11T6 Naglers. 

 

I don't know why people didn't buy these, but they are just as indispensable in my binoviewer as the 24mm Pans.

 

Ron

+1 on that.  I like the 11T6 in my C11 (~250x).  Seems to be a sweet spot between higher magnification and my seeing conditions.  I can routinely use the 11T6 on planets but not so much the 9T6 (due to my seeing conditions).  Sharp eyepiece!

 

Televue should bring that one back.  In the T6 family, it's a big jump between the 13T6 and the 9T6.


  • Jacques, RichD, RAKing and 5 others like this

#21 csrlice12

csrlice12

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 35,555
  • Joined: 22 May 2012
  • Loc: Denver, CO

Posted 01 March 2025 - 04:59 PM

This one....This is an approx 5mm with about a 44* afov.  All I can  find out about the company is that it mostly did DIY including a 6" newt.   It existed in NYC circa 1935.  This little eyepiece is sharper on axis than anything else I own, orthos to Ethos.  Got it in a wooden box from S&S Optika as from an estate sale.  The wooden box also contained a 20mm Orthostar Erfle and the 26.6, 10, and 6.6mm Orthostars, and a 16mm Volcano top Brandon (preVernonscope), so it was in good company.  Anybody knowing anything more about this company, let me know.

 

20250301_1443551.jpg 20250301_1443001.jpg


  • Rick-T137 and AstroBoyInTheCity like this

#22 dave253

dave253

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,736
  • Joined: 08 Oct 2010
  • Loc: Australia 28.24S 153.25E

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:10 PM

12.5 UO circle T ortho, Vixen LV series. Although I’m not sure they’re underrated.


  • Rick-T137 and eblanken like this

#23 chemisted

chemisted

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,221
  • Joined: 24 Feb 2012

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:12 PM

TV Radians. 

 

As newer models like the Delites came out, the Radians seemed to garner some negativity. And sure, the Delites have better edge performance are lighter and have a better eye guard. But if you can put up with those slight negatives, the Radians offer 20mm of ER, excellent centerfield sharpness, good ergonomics and can be had on the used marker at half the price of a Delite.
 
I have the 3mm, 4mm and 6mm Radians. I also have 6 Delites. I'm in no hurry to sell the Radians.

 

Bob

Bob,

I was chatting with Al Nagler early in 2005 about my recently acquired TeleVue-140. Always the salesman, he encouraged me to buy his new 2.5 mm T6. I responded that I found my 3 mm Radian was nicely filling that spot and he didn't argue.

Ed 


Edited by chemisted, 01 March 2025 - 05:13 PM.

  • Kutno and Rick-T137 like this

#24 Jay_Reynolds_Freeman

Jay_Reynolds_Freeman

    Messenger

  • *****
  • Posts: 495
  • Joined: 10 May 2019

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:17 PM

Not a single eyepiece, but I have a set of three Ramsdens, with focal lengths of 1/4 inch, 1/2 inch, and one inch, that appear to have been made with World War Two military surplus lenses that received an excellent polish. Only four air/glass interfaces and excellent polish means very low scattered light, and of course, classic Ramsdens are exceptionally well corrected for lateral color. Thus they deliver excellent views of planets in long-focal-ratio instruments.

 

Clear sky ...


  • dryfly, dave253 and Rick-T137 like this

#25 dawnpatrol

dawnpatrol

    Viking 1

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 690
  • Joined: 22 Apr 2009
  • Loc: SEPA

Posted 01 March 2025 - 06:35 PM

Televue 11T6 Naglers. 

 

I don't know why people didn't buy these, but they are just as indispensable in my binoviewer as the 24mm Pans.

 

Ron

I couldn't agree more. They're mainstays in my binoviewer.  


  • RAKing, Rick-T137 and Maximus001 like this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics