Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

New ZWO Cameras

Charts
  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 hughesthompson

hughesthompson

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 09 May 2020
  • Loc: Atlanta

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:15 PM

Cuiv the Lazy Geek interviewed Sam Wen, founder of ZWO, at a trade show in Japan yesterday.  The YouTube video is here: https://youtu.be/Phe...8gNqTzQCVqr-L-t

 

In addition to some Seestar comments, Sam showed off a couple of new integrated cameras, the ASI2600MM Air, and the ASI585MC Air.  Looks like ZWO is going all in on this type of combo with the guide chip and ASIair integrated into the camera.  The 585 Air is particularly interesting since it's the small format camera body and would be very portable.  Hopefully they will extend this concept to the 533 chip as well.

 

Hughes


Edited by hughesthompson, 01 March 2025 - 05:15 PM.

  • miketz, kgb, Avgvstvs and 1 other like this

#2 DeepSky Di

DeepSky Di

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 5,893
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2020

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:19 PM

Cuiv the Lazy Geek interviewed Sam Wen, founder of ZWO, at a trade show in Japan yesterday.  The YouTube video is here: https://youtu.be/Phe...8gNqTzQCVqr-L-t

 

In addition to some Seestar comments, Sam showed off a couple of new integrated cameras, the ASI2600MM Air, and the ASI585MC Air.  Looks like ZWO is going all in on this type of combo with the guide chip and ASIair integrated into the camera.  The 585 Air is particularly interesting since it's the small format camera body and would be very portable.  Hopefully they will extend this concept to the 533 chip as well.

 

Hughes

When Cuiv asked whether we'll get rumored products Seestar S70 or AM7 the answer was "all of them."

 

Cuiv forgot to ask about the EAF Pro :-(


  • Cryhavoc38 likes this

#3 Notdarkenough

Notdarkenough

    Gemini

  • *****
  • Posts: 3,206
  • Joined: 17 Jan 2021
  • Loc: 5000' ft @ 41° North

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:25 PM

My favorite was the "internal" focusing inside an astrocam. I would love than. Good question, Cuiv! I can wait for that innovation, but they really need to expand the Star Atlas catalog for AAs. It is simply abysmal. Maybe make it like ASTAP, where you can decide how large a catalog you want to use vs data space available. 


  • rlmxracer and hughesthompson like this

#4 hughesthompson

hughesthompson

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 09 May 2020
  • Loc: Atlanta

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:28 PM

When Cuiv asked whether we'll get rumored products Seestar S70 or AM7 the answer was "all of them."

 

Cuiv forgot to ask about the EAF Pro :-(

What did you think of Cuiv's suggestion of a micro-focuser with 1mm travel built into the camera!  Anything built into the camera will mess with back-focus but that's less of an issue with the modern Petzval and similar designs.


  • DeepSky Di likes this

#5 DeepSky Di

DeepSky Di

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Moderators
  • Posts: 5,893
  • Joined: 15 Aug 2020

Posted 01 March 2025 - 05:52 PM

What did you think of Cuiv's suggestion of a micro-focuser with 1mm travel built into the camera!  Anything built into the camera will mess with back-focus but that's less of an issue with the modern Petzval and similar designs.

I was initially surprised, but maybe it works if you can get into approximate focus manually and then microfocus from there. I'm so used to having EAFs and not being able to focus manually, so it would be quite a change!

 

I'm still skeptical about duo cameras and 3nm narrowband filters. I'd like to see a filter wheel with rectangular filters for APS-C and a hole for the duo guide camera. Of course, someone would have to make the rectangular APS-C filters. 

 

As for the rumored EAF Pro, my guess is it would have wifi and maybe even an on board battery, to disconnect it from the rotating components on the other side of the CAA.


  • hyiger and NorthScope like this

#6 Jim Waters

Jim Waters

    Voyager 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 10,047
  • Joined: 21 Oct 2007
  • Loc: Phoenix, AZ USA

Posted 01 March 2025 - 06:16 PM

I would like to know their plans for the next generation of AM5N mounts.  I have one and love it.



#7 hyiger

hyiger

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,620
  • Joined: 05 Sep 2021
  • Loc: East Bay, CA & South East, VA

Posted 01 March 2025 - 08:21 PM

I was initially surprised, but maybe it works if you can get into approximate focus manually and then microfocus from there. I'm so used to having EAFs and not being able to focus manually, so it would be quite a change!

 

I'm still skeptical about duo cameras and 3nm narrowband filters. I'd like to see a filter wheel with rectangular filters for APS-C and a hole for the duo guide camera. Of course, someone would have to make the rectangular APS-C filters. 

 

As for the rumored EAF Pro, my guess is it would have wifi and maybe even an on board battery, to disconnect it from the rotating components on the other side of the CAA.

+1 there is no way I will ever have a use case for a Duo unless it's on a short and fast scope. Especially now that I use 2.5nm filters. I like the idea of having the guide camera peek over the filters. 


Edited by hyiger, 01 March 2025 - 08:22 PM.

  • w7ay, joshman and dannymcshane like this

#8 w7ay

w7ay

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2015
  • Loc: Portland, Oregon

Posted 01 March 2025 - 08:57 PM

Anything built into the camera will mess with back-focus but that's less of an issue with the modern Petzval and similar designs.

+++ 100%

 

An "internal" focuser will not work with anything but Petzval telescopes, where you don't use flatteners or reducers.

 

As you change that internal focuser in the camera, what you are changing is the backfocus distance between the sensor and the reducer/flattener, not the distance between the objective lens and the flattener, where a focuser needs to be.

 

What an in-camera focuser is useful for is adjusting backfocus when you change filters with different thickness, but again, Petzvals don't care about that.  So, it is useful in places (Petzval) when it is not needed :-).

 

Chen


Edited by w7ay, 01 March 2025 - 08:58 PM.

  • ShortLobster likes this

#9 w7ay

w7ay

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2015
  • Loc: Portland, Oregon

Posted 01 March 2025 - 09:19 PM

+1 there is no way I will ever have a use case for a Duo unless it's on a short and fast scope. Especially now that I use 2.5nm filters. I like the idea of having the guide camera peek over the filters. 

SBIG tried the two-sensor cameras back in the old days as the ST-7.

 

http://www.company7....oducts/st7.html

https://patents.goog...t/US5525793A/en

 

I mentioned the camera to Sam in an email a couple of years ago, but warned him that it is not useful for narrowband filters (i.e., serious astroimagers).  But he ran with it anyway; I think ZWO is after "convienience" for the novice ("Easy as 1,2,3"), rather than performance for serious hobbyists.  More money in that.

 

SBIG wised up and gave up on that diversion, and later cameras include a camera combo that integrated a main camera, filter wheel and a guide camera which is not obstructed by filters.  E.g. the STF series

 

https://diffractionl.../06/AAS_STF.pdf

 

Pretty complex set of prisms, though.  But a small sensor can probably be placed inside the filter wheel itself, and avoid any additional optical elements.

 

(I still have my SBIG ST-8300, but not the "F," though :-).

 

Instead of adding a guide sensor to a main camera, a filter wheel that includes a guide camera might make sense as a product (again stealing half the idea from SBIG).  But don't tell Sam I mentioned it, since he might want to make money off of such an idea too, without testing all scenerios out :-)

 

Chen


Edited by w7ay, 01 March 2025 - 10:35 PM.


#10 andysea

andysea

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 7,135
  • Joined: 03 Sep 2010
  • Loc: Seattle, WA

Posted 01 March 2025 - 09:57 PM

I suppose an in-camera micro focuser may be useful to dial in the perfect back focus for reducer/correctors etc...

I would not want that in my cameras tho. The fewer moving parts the better.


  • aaube, w7ay and licho52 like this

#11 Strewth78

Strewth78

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2025
  • Loc: Haarlem Netherlands

Posted 02 March 2025 - 03:35 AM

I wonder what the actual release date will be. I have a holiday to a bottle 2 nightsky on April 21st and would love to take the 585air.

...but I feel like I might be a couple weeks too early

#12 licho52

licho52

    Viking 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 911
  • Joined: 15 Dec 2020

Posted 02 March 2025 - 05:13 AM

Can hardly contain excitement about these products.



#13 BKMaynard

BKMaynard

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,064
  • Joined: 21 Feb 2013
  • Loc: Maryville, Il. (st.louis area)

Posted 02 March 2025 - 08:13 AM

Meh


  • mikefulb likes this

#14 hyiger

hyiger

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,620
  • Joined: 05 Sep 2021
  • Loc: East Bay, CA & South East, VA

Posted 02 March 2025 - 10:59 AM

There is a post by ZWO in their forums where they are taking an informal survey as to whether people have an appetite for them embedding an ASIAir inside the mount head of an AM5 or AM3. As long as I can turn it off and still use NINA I might go for something like that. Anyway, stuffing everything inside a 2600 camera body has got to end at some point and has never appealed to me. 


  • w7ay and TomT_NJ like this

#15 Helyis

Helyis

    Mariner 2

  • -----
  • Posts: 288
  • Joined: 16 Jan 2023
  • Loc: Grenoble, France

Posted 02 March 2025 - 08:34 PM

Wake me up when we get a new, modern, micro 4/3 camera
  • Ptarmigan, Phillip Creed, Ulysses and 8 others like this

#16 ShortLobster

ShortLobster

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 372
  • Joined: 17 Sep 2016
  • Loc: Stamford, CT, USA

Posted 03 March 2025 - 08:26 AM

The most interesting comment coming out of the video is that ZWO has sold 100000 ASIAirs. I'm struggling coming up with any other astrophotography product that has sold that many units. Maybe Pixinsight. Celestron SCTs? 



#17 hughesthompson

hughesthompson

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 09 May 2020
  • Loc: Atlanta

Posted 03 March 2025 - 12:33 PM

The most interesting comment coming out of the video is that ZWO has sold 100000 ASIAirs. I'm struggling coming up with any other astrophotography product that has sold that many units. Maybe Pixinsight. Celestron SCTs? 

Though not exclusively an astrophotography product, sales estimates for the C8 alone are over 200,000 units.  Has to be the most popular scope ever made.  There does not seem to be any good data on total Pixinsight sales but among AstroBin users it's more popular than the ASIAir (10,000 users vs 7,500).



#18 hyiger

hyiger

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,620
  • Joined: 05 Sep 2021
  • Loc: East Bay, CA & South East, VA

Posted 03 March 2025 - 02:24 PM

Though not exclusively an astrophotography product, sales estimates for the C8 alone are over 200,000 units.  Has to be the most popular scope ever made.  There does not seem to be any good data on total Pixinsight sales but among AstroBin users it's more popular than the ASIAir (10,000 users vs 7,500).

Is that 200K units in a year or since inception? If the later, the C8's been out for 55 years. 



#19 Anthony_1138

Anthony_1138

    Explorer 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 75
  • Joined: 05 Dec 2013
  • Loc: El Dorado Hills, CA

Posted 03 March 2025 - 02:27 PM

The AM7 comment interested me - I guess that would be a strain wave mount with a higher payload than the AM5N?  The AM5N recommends focal lengths <=900mm.  An AM5-style mount that can support larger payloads and longer focal lengths would be great, especially if they can get into the range for common SCTs, e.g. an Edge HD8 (2000mm or 1400mm with the reducer).


  • ShortLobster likes this

#20 Phillip Creed

Phillip Creed

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,770
  • Joined: 25 Jul 2006
  • Loc: Canal Fulton, OH

Posted 03 March 2025 - 03:04 PM

The AM7 comment interested me - I guess that would be a strain wave mount with a higher payload than the AM5N?  The AM5N recommends focal lengths <=900mm.  An AM5-style mount that can support larger payloads and longer focal lengths would be great, especially if they can get into the range for common SCTs, e.g. an Edge HD8 (2000mm or 1400mm with the reducer).

ZWO *recommends* <= 900mm focal lengths for the AM5.  I know several folks who've successfully imaged with them using 8" SCTs, even at f/10.

Clear Skies,

Phil



#21 hughesthompson

hughesthompson

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 09 May 2020
  • Loc: Atlanta

Posted 03 March 2025 - 03:49 PM

Is that 200K units in a year or since inception? If the later, the C8's been out for 55 years. 

That's 200,000 total based on the estimate in this post: https://www.cloudyni...n-8s/?p=9975065



#22 hughesthompson

hughesthompson

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 146
  • Joined: 09 May 2020
  • Loc: Atlanta

Posted 03 March 2025 - 04:02 PM

+1 there is no way I will ever have a use case for a Duo unless it's on a short and fast scope. Especially now that I use 2.5nm filters. I like the idea of having the guide camera peek over the filters. 

Maybe the simplest solution to the filter problem would be a rectangular drop-in or clip-in filter that sits right above the protect window and clears the guide chip.  You would not want it spaced further out since unfiltered light could leak over to the main sensor. 




CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Charts



Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics