Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

"Damage" to the moon? You'd have to nuke it to see any damage

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 RichA

RichA

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 13,508
  • Joined: 03 Jun 2010
  • Loc: Toronto, Canada

Posted 20 March 2025 - 12:22 AM

Also, what would be the damage, displaced rocks and dust?  Since no one is going to nuke the moon, what possible kind of damage could impact anyone?  Building a giant open pit mine?  That could, but good luck mining without any water.  Australians have methods of mining without water, due to the lack of water there, but doing it on any kind of major industrial mining scale would be very hard.

 

https://phys.org/new...-wild-west.html

 

 


  • MeridianStarGazer likes this

#2 EJN

EJN

    Fly Me to the Moon

  • *****
  • Posts: 6,053
  • Joined: 01 Nov 2005

Posted 20 March 2025 - 02:27 AM

There's already been lots of damage to the moon

 

post-12877-0-23573300-1726357119.jpg


  • Littlegreenman, happylimpet, MeridianStarGazer and 3 others like this

#3 triplemon

triplemon

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,462
  • Joined: 07 Nov 2023
  • Loc: Portland, OR

Posted 20 March 2025 - 03:22 AM

At least two of the Apollo mission deliberately steered the S-IVB upper booster into the moon. To create seismic signals for analyzing its interior with the seismometers installed by earlier Apollo missions. So that is sort of intentional created damage.

 

There are also folks having observed later spacecraft impacting it in precisely choreographed location, to study the ejecta clouds. Don't recall if they ever saw anything, though. But that would certainly count as "intentional inflicting visible damage".



#4 MeridianStarGazer

MeridianStarGazer

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,195
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2013
  • Loc: USA

Posted 23 March 2025 - 11:05 AM

I am all in favor of mining the moon. And putting houses on it. Resources for Earth and for building space habitats. We need to build several huge telescopes up there.

Mars is the one that needs to be examined for life a bit longer. We have only one chance. Other stars are too far away.

#5 RichA

RichA

    Hubble

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 13,508
  • Joined: 03 Jun 2010
  • Loc: Toronto, Canada

Posted 23 March 2025 - 01:45 PM

At least two of the Apollo mission deliberately steered the S-IVB upper booster into the moon. To create seismic signals for analyzing its interior with the seismometers installed by earlier Apollo missions. So that is sort of intentional created damage.

 

There are also folks having observed later spacecraft impacting it in precisely choreographed location, to study the ejecta clouds. Don't recall if they ever saw anything, though. But that would certainly count as "intentional inflicting visible damage".

You could lump footprints into that extreme.  Resolution on the moon from Earth anyway is limited to around 1/10th of a mile.



#6 moefuzz

moefuzz

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,639
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2023

Posted 24 March 2025 - 07:03 AM

There have been some decent moon orbital probe pictures of crashed

and/or failed landings and impacts that show star burst like patterns

in the disturbed Regolith much like small meteor hits

 

Usually these small landers create impacts in the order of 10 to 20 meters

but can be larger depending on speed at impact

 

 

Japan's moon-landing error caused its robot to land upside-down (left),

 

Israeli nonprofit SpaceIL's error caused its lander to crash (right).

 

 

FAILED MOON LANDINGS AND IMPACTS.jpg


Edited by moefuzz, 24 March 2025 - 07:04 AM.


#7 MeridianStarGazer

MeridianStarGazer

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,195
  • Joined: 01 Dec 2013
  • Loc: USA

Posted 25 March 2025 - 01:47 PM

Let's fire non nuclear missles at it, with enhanced rockets, to prove we can hit meteors. the craters make good targets. Common, Russia, USA, and China: show you stuff! Call your shots or they don't count.

#8 moefuzz

moefuzz

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,639
  • Joined: 12 Jun 2023

Posted 26 March 2025 - 02:27 PM

I am all in favor of mining the moon.  We need to build several huge telescopes up there.

 

lol.gif  rofl2.gif roflmao.gif

Why not do a whole selection, you can start with the sea of serenity which sounds like a blissful place to spend time!


Edited by moefuzz, 26 March 2025 - 02:36 PM.



CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics