If you insist on putting in a value for the field stop as well, for whatever reason, here's the math to get the "effective field stop".
The ratio of the effective field stop to the focal length of the scope is the true field one sees in radians, distortions aside. So, let's say an eyepiece plus scope plus device yields a true field of one degree. That's about 1 degree / (57.3 degrees per radian) of true field. That is the ratio of your effective field stop to your focal length, distortions aside.
So, your telescope focal length is: 1826mm.
Your eyepieces are 67mm and 30mm, both with an effective AFOV of 40 degrees when using the device after them.
The magnifications with those eyepieces and that scope is about 1826mm / 67mm and 1826mm / 30mm, respectively, for about 27.25x, and 60.86x, respectively.
Those magnifications both appear to span 40 degrees as seen through the eyepiece and the device. The true fields of each are, therefore, distortions aside, 40 degrees / 27.25x and 40 degrees / 60.86x. Those true fields are 1.4679 degrees and 0.6572 degrees, respectively.
So the effective field stops with your eyepiece and your device are, respectively:
(1.4679 degrees / (57.3 degrees per radian)) * 1826mm ~ 46.77mm (which makes sense for a 67 Plossl!!!); and,
0.6572 degrees / (57.3 degrees per radian)) * 1826mm ~ 20.94mm (which makes sense for fitting twice the mag of the 67 Plossl into the same AFOV of 40 degrees).
If you notice carefully, one multiplies by the focal length of the scope to get the magnification, then divides by the focal length of the scope to get the effective field stop. The telescope itself is thus irrelevant for the effective field stop of that eyepiece plus the device. Try out the same thing with another one of your telescopes to see that. Try to figure out a way to avoid needing the telescope focal length at all (hint: think of the relationship between the eyepiece's actual effective field stop and its AFOV, to the relationship with a 40 degree AFOV).