OK, I'm "Mr. Stock" when it comes to things like cars, cameras, and airplanes. In fact, I'm the most liberal when it comes to modifying airplanes (within certification limits, of course!) because well-maintained airframes don't age, but things like avionics and lighting do.
The fact that I'm even considering modifying a camera and posting a question shows you how hooked I've gotten. So having said that, we're* getting ready to modify one of my Canon bodies for AP, either one of the 200Ds or my old Xsi. The R6 is off limits. We're leaning towards one of the 200Ds because the firmware is newer and there's a bit of concern that NINA and others will give up on the legacy Canon firmware.
At present, I'm leaning towards the folks up in Utah - it says a lot when my local, highly regarded brick and mortar store says that's where they send their AP cameras.
One of the menu choices on the order form is whether or not to remove the AA filter. I get what the filter does and why Canon installed it in that vintage camera, but is it worth the extra $75 to pull it?
BTW, before someone says "Well, then get a dedicated camera like a ZWO," or some such, I want the flexibility to use my Canon-mount lenses to do wide field with the camera.**
===============================================================
*Wife-approved expenditure. This took almost no convincing. And I'm still a bit stunned.
**I know, in about a year I'll probably be asking advice about those, but humor me.