Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Can you design a 3 point mirror support cell using PLOP

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Dale Eason

Dale Eason

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,490
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2009
  • Loc: Roseville,Mn.

Posted 25 May 2025 - 12:14 AM

I thought I knew how to use PLOP but now when I try to see where it would place points on a 3 point cell it does not show any dimensions it says there are no parts and thus shows no dimensions.  Anyone know how to make it work?



#2 Arjan

Arjan

    Surveyor 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 1,833
  • Joined: 21 Jan 2009
  • Loc: Netherlands

Posted 25 May 2025 - 05:32 AM

Radius is somewhere around 40% usually, for 3 pt cells.

#3 davidlewis

davidlewis

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: 06 Jan 2021
  • Loc: Toronto, Canada

Posted 25 May 2025 - 06:35 AM

There are no parts in a 3 point cell because the 3 primary supports directly support the mirror. Parts refers to bars and triangles, which are only used in larger cells.

 

As Arjan says, around 40% radius is typical, but is non critical. Plop optimizes support only considering mirror deformation, which gives this number. However mechanical rigidity might cause you to want a larger radius.



#4 Dale Eason

Dale Eason

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,490
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2009
  • Loc: Roseville,Mn.

Posted 25 May 2025 - 05:57 PM

There are no parts in a 3 point cell because the 3 primary supports directly support the mirror. Parts refers to bars and triangles, which are only used in larger cells.

 

As Arjan says, around 40% radius is typical, but is non critical. Plop optimizes support only considering mirror deformation, which gives this number. However mechanical rigidity might cause you to want a larger radius.

Thank you.  So what you are saying is the contour maps and color maps and other metrics are based on that 40% radius.  



#5 davidlewis

davidlewis

    Explorer 1

  • -----
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: 06 Jan 2021
  • Loc: Toronto, Canada

Posted 25 May 2025 - 06:07 PM

Thank you.  So what you are saying is the contour maps and color maps and other metrics are based on that 40% radius.  

They are based on whatever radius and design you are modeling. If you are choosing to use an 80% radius, it will show that. If you are optimizing the cell and it goes to 40% then it shows that.



#6 Dale Eason

Dale Eason

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,490
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2009
  • Loc: Roseville,Mn.

Posted 25 May 2025 - 10:30 PM

They are based on whatever radius and design you are modeling. If you are choosing to use an 80% radius, it will show that. If you are optimizing the cell and it goes to 40% then it shows that.

I got lost.  Where to you choose the radius.

 

Never mind I found it and figured out what I was doing wrong.  I had only been using the automated option.


Edited by Dale Eason, 25 May 2025 - 10:34 PM.


#7 Dale Eason

Dale Eason

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,490
  • Joined: 24 Nov 2009
  • Loc: Roseville,Mn.

Posted 26 May 2025 - 04:20 AM

I wanted to add thank you David Lewis for that program.  I have used it many years ago for several telescopes.  At one time I even used the interferometer and my DFTFringe program to monitor a mirror in the mirror cell and added a little extra force on one of the support points by making it taller than the rest and then watched the simulated results from PLOP agree with the actual deformation.  


  • Oberon and davidlewis like this


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics