One of the problems with massed produced mounts are they are just that. What ever is inexpensive, what ever is easiest to put together quickly, what ever can move through QC quickest and what turns the best profits is what will be used. For years the US automotive industry practiced "design obsolescence". Why? Because they wanted you to by a new car every 3 to 5 years. Their goal was to keep you in the loop and sell cars, sell their product. Celestron and other massed produced products have adopted the same ideology. But understood that price point had to be reasonable and affordable At one point in my adventure I was a die hard Celestron fan of both their telescopes and mounts and Celestron was the only mount I would purchase. First, because it was affordable. The price was reasonable and at the very top end of what I could afford. However, my opinion has changed about Celestron mounts. I will not buy one unless I am not concerned with the longevity of the mount or it's obsolescence. The Celestron mounts are okay for entry level but I don't expect them to be permanent. They will either fail or they will become obsolete so you can't buy parts to fix it.
Second, I wanted to get into astronomy. I wanted to "look at stuff". My first tracking mount was a Celestron CG5. I was so proud of that mount. It was my mount. Celestron later on came out with the ASGT, which if I remember right had goto capability, and then the ADVGT and it had more bells and whistles and the price was a little more than I paid for my CG5. I sold the CG5 to a friend of mine to help finance a new ADVGT. Not long after the release of the ADVGT parts for anything that it superseded it were becoming scarce.( this is when trouble soon began. I just didn't know it) I had read that if you sent the ADVGT to a company called Deep Space products they could "Super Tune" the ADVGT. Off it went. I got it back in about a month or so and could not wait to try it out. It worked wonderfully. I was doing victory dances around the mount. I used the ADVGT for a few years and it performed wonderfully as far has I was concerned. It spent some time in and out of this kind of weather. But, I didn't leave it in a car or did I put it outside without a cover on it. During wet weather I'd put a large contractors trash bag over it and wrap that with a solar blanket, shinny side out during hot weather. I didn't have the weatherproof covers like we have today. Which in itself these covers are pretty amazing.
Temperatures here in Nevada range between single digits into triple digits year around. I have experienced 3" of snow on the 4th of July and temperatures as hot has triple digits teens and 120s when I worked in Death Valley. What destroys the plastics, paint, wood, electronics is exposure to the spectrum of UV light, not necessarily the temperatures. Things left in the Nevada sun without being shaded or covered will deteriorate quickly. Average elevation of Nevada is around 5500 feet. Higher altitude, less atmosphere are major contributors to this deterioration because more UV is present. Next time your up at Lake Tahoe during sun-shinny weather take your shirt off and see how fast you get sunburned. We recognized that things were most damaged when left out without a cover or just in the shade and it happened quickly. Time for some experimentation.
The preceding reasons were why the observatory director decided to try these experiments with some of the equipment. (He's a physics guy). So we selected some OTAs and mounts to put out originally for only a year. But, after the year everything appeared to be in good shape and decided to leave the stuff out for another year. It was about 3/4 way into the 2nd year that we encountered some vandalism to the equipment and decided to bring the equipment in and bring a close to the experiment. We decided that it wasn't the weather per se that caused the problems. Because we have sun, wind, sand, rain and snow that cycle through out the year. So what was it that caused the deterioration of things left out in the weather. We came up with the UV theory. UV is always very high here in Nevada and it will deteriorate almost anything.
Long experiment made short. The OTAs all work fine. The newer Celestron mount went south with electronic issues. Whether it was a result of it's time on the deck or just went bad is unknown. It started acting up shortly after we ended the experiment. I have yet to get into to see if it is repairable.
Clear Skies Never Lose the Wonder
RF