Looking to get into some light lunar AP with an untracked/manual 8" Dob (200/1200)
I've been looking at the planetary "rules of AP" but having a hard time selecting between the ZWO ASI585MC and the ZWO ASI676MC
I guess according to the "rules" of 5x pixel size = target f/ratio, either it's f/14.5 with the ASI585 and f/10 wit the ASI676.
Since I own a 2x Barlow already I included that calculation; putting me at f/12, which is right in between the two.
Since I'm untracked I'm assuming FOV and FPS is paramount (FOV is comparable between the two).
I'm in suburban skies and occasionally travel a bit to rural, so almost never have excellent seeing. So if one is better assuming not excellent seeing that also is relevant.
For Lunar AP, is it better to be a little "over" the "5x Pixel Size" or "under" it?
FOV is comparable between the two, so I'm not as concerned about that, more about getting the best detail.
Is there a target Pixel Scale I should be looking for?
Just based on Pixel Scale I would be thinking the 676 is better, but a lot of people here seem to prefer the slightly larger pixels of the 585.
(Also, if it's there's a big difference in ability to do some light untracked EAA on smallish objects where FOV doesn't matter, such as globs e.g. M13, that would also influence my decision i.e. would be willing to give up a bit of detail if 585 has a non-negligible difference to do light EAA)
I know an EQ mount + tracking is really the way to go for best results with AP, but just curious what's possible here. If the answer is that it's really not possible with an EQ mount, that's OK too.
Edited by sky_lounge, 11 June 2025 - 11:06 PM.