Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Jupiter 11.08

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 PiotrM

PiotrM

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,244
  • Joined: 03 Jan 2010

Posted 10 August 2010 - 08:35 PM

f/15 IR-IRGB:
Posted Image

Posted Image


Posted Image
Io is coming out. DMK was running in 60 FPS mode so the artifact is there. This one has to go soon :p


f/28 R-RGB Convolution:
Posted Image

Posted Image

- Animation
- Animation of red channel


f/28 R-RGB Wavelets:
Posted Image

Posted Image

- Animation
- Animation of red channel

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

H-alpha 12nm vs Pro Planet 742:
Posted Image
Jupiter is very dim in H-alpha (weak H and methane bands there)

Io comming out:
- Animation

#2 Kokatha man

Kokatha man

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 17,936
  • Joined: 13 Sep 2009

Posted 10 August 2010 - 08:50 PM

Some nice details showing there Piotr.....got some "enchanting chickens" from Emil huh..?!? :lol: :waytogo: :waytogo:

#3 PiotrM

PiotrM

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,244
  • Joined: 03 Jan 2010

Posted 11 August 2010 - 02:23 AM

They say that they are chickens, but they do look a bit strange. When I wasn't looking they took total control of Io ;)

#4 MvZ

MvZ

    Surveyor 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,891
  • Joined: 03 Apr 2007

Posted 11 August 2010 - 06:04 AM

Nice images Piotr, especially the "f/28 R-RGB Wavelets" version, and the animation of course.

Some images show a little bit too much noise in the brightest parts though, probably caused by selective sharpening (or an unsharp-mask or wavelet with a threshold for example). I think they would look better if the image is more or less equally sharpened overall, but still your images are getting better and better!

#5 PiotrM

PiotrM

    Skylab

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 4,244
  • Joined: 03 Jan 2010

Posted 11 August 2010 - 06:19 AM

They could use a bit of blur to remove the pixelish noise. I do that with IR-RGB at f/20. RRGB at f/28 without the IR (to dim) it's harder to keep detailer after bluring/denoising. Blur + deconvolution could probably help, but the fine details get fluffy and bigger.

When using such wavelets:
Posted Image
The image won't be glossy and shiny :D


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics