Jump to content

  •  

CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.

Photo

Homemade folded refractor

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
35 replies to this topic

#1 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 10 February 2005 - 05:36 PM

Just finished this little winter project.

I bought an Orion 120mm f/8.3 last year and was so impressed with the optics that I decided to buy its big brother the 150mm f/8 Synta OTA. The problem was that it was too long to use on my Universal Astronomics UniStar mount (alti azimuth) and too awkward to use at zenith, so I decided to try a new approach by folding the light path and bring it out the side. This was accomplished using a Newtionian secondary mirror (3.1 in) and mirror holder.

This addresses both objectives, reducing the tube length to 36 inches and by the use of a 2 inch diagonal, keeps the eyepiece comfortably oriented throughout the altitude range from horizontal to vertical. The diagonal is rotated in the focuser as the altitude angle is changed, keeping the eyepiece in the same relative position within the 13 inch arc of rotation.

This allows for easy sweeping of the telescope, which is intended for rich field viewing of the Milky Way starfields and also comet searching.

The "tube" is constructed of 1/2 and 3/4 inch birch cabinet plywood, and the interior is completely lined with 3M flocking paper to maximize contrast.

The focuser is a custom MoonLite refractor focuser similiar to the model used to retrofit the 120 and 150mm Syntas. I had it made completely matte black and a flat base to allow mounting to the tube.The inside of the drawtube is lined with flocking paper to completely eliminate unwanted reflections.

The objective is the standard Synta; I hacksawed off the collar that screws onto the tube, retained the lower part of the cell that allows collimation.

The entire tube assembly complete with AP diagonal and 40mm Konig ep and Telrad finder weighs about 28 pounds.

Mr. Bill

Attached Thumbnails

  • 339783-01010187.JPG


#2 Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*

Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*
  • -----

Posted 10 February 2005 - 06:00 PM

Nice work. How do the star tests look (ie. before vs. after the folding?)

#3 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 10 February 2005 - 06:10 PM

Ariel Antares Optics secondary mirror (1/15 wave) and Astro Physics diagonal have negligible effect on image.

Objective is slightly undercorrected; color is what one would expect from this size and speed achromat. As Synta optics go, this is on the good side of the curve.

Remember, this is NOT intended for planetary or star splitting, but rich field viewing at 30x to 100x.

Attached Thumbnails

  • 339820-01010146.JPG


#4 Tom L

Tom L

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 31,061
  • Joined: 07 Jan 2004

Posted 10 February 2005 - 07:08 PM

Nice design and great solution on the long focal length.

#5 Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*

Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*
  • -----

Posted 11 February 2005 - 12:28 AM

Very nice design, I like it.

Ever thought about building another one and placing them side by side? You'll have a reverse binocular telescope! :D Mounting would be very tricky though, as would alignment.

#6 Tom L

Tom L

    ISS

  • *****
  • Posts: 31,061
  • Joined: 07 Jan 2004

Posted 11 February 2005 - 12:51 AM

It could be done, though. Good idea Ken.

#7 Jeff Morgan

Jeff Morgan

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,243
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2003

Posted 11 February 2005 - 12:34 PM

Nice job Mr. Bill! I've always wanted to do something like that with a long-focus lens. Call it "refractor in a suitcase".

#8 Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*

Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*
  • -----

Posted 11 February 2005 - 01:51 PM

I was imagining multiple reflections in that box so I was wondering if the slight shift off-axis was important. But with your internal picture I can see that isn't the case.

#9 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 11 February 2005 - 03:06 PM

Posted another picture to show mount and dovetail plate attachment detail....

Mr. Bill

#10 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 11 February 2005 - 03:09 PM

Opps....try to post picture again. Still getting the hang of this

Attached Thumbnails

  • 340702-01010203.JPG


#11 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 18 April 2005 - 06:25 PM

New incarnation....

Moved focuser over to dovetail side to put weight closer to tripod CL. This increases stability to tipping and lowers dampening time.

Attached Thumbnails

  • 410651-01010224.JPG


#12 Jeff Morgan

Jeff Morgan

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,243
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2003

Posted 19 April 2005 - 08:26 PM

Nice work. How do the star tests look (ie. before vs. after the folding?)


I've been interested in doing this for some time and am considering it for my next project. Using Newtonian diagonals just makes a lot of sense. One conern I had was the conventioanl wisdom of keeping the angles small. I want a right angle solution like Mr. Bill. It occured to me that flats should be like most other optics - the errors are predominantly near the edges. I had a conversation with Bryan Greer at ProtoStar about this, and he confirmed it. By using oversized diagonals, the wavefront error is ridiculously small, allowing for large angles and great performance. Looking at the interfeogram on my ProtoStar mirror, I can see it is numerically about 1/17th wave (red light). Qualitatively, I can see almost all of that error occurs at the edge. The center is better by perhaps an order of magnitude. Probably below the ability of the intferogram to measure it.

#13 erik

erik

    telescope surgeon

  • *****
  • Posts: 24,858
  • Joined: 30 Jan 2004

Posted 19 April 2005 - 09:17 PM

very cool! i bet you get some curious looks at star parties, huh? looks great! :cool:

#14 Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*

Guest_**DONOTDELETE**_*
  • -----

Posted 19 April 2005 - 10:20 PM

For terrestrial use, this configuration has a correct image if you stand alongside the scope!

-- William

#15 Jeff Morgan

Jeff Morgan

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,243
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2003

Posted 20 April 2005 - 12:30 PM

As long as you keep the number of mirrors even, that should be the case.

#16 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 20 April 2005 - 05:49 PM

very cool! i bet you get some curious looks at star parties, huh? looks great! :cool:


Thanks! Don't know, haven't been to public starparty since I built it. Had some very positive comments from knowledgeable observers, though.

Thinking of attending the Oregon SP this year and bringing.

Mr. Bill

#17 Mr. Bill

Mr. Bill

    Cosmos

  • *****
  • topic starter
  • Posts: 9,823
  • Joined: 09 Feb 2005

Posted 20 April 2005 - 07:32 PM

Nice work. How do the star tests look (ie. before vs. after the folding?)


I've been interested in doing this for some time and am considering it for my next project. Using Newtonian diagonals just makes a lot of sense. One conern I had was the conventioanl wisdom of keeping the angles small. I want a right angle solution like Mr. Bill. It occured to me that flats should be like most other optics - the errors are predominantly near the edges. I had a conversation with Bryan Greer at ProtoStar about this, and he confirmed it. By using oversized diagonals, the wavefront error is ridiculously small, allowing for large angles and great performance. Looking at the interfeogram on my ProtoStar mirror, I can see it is numerically about 1/17th wave (red light). Qualitatively, I can see almost all of that error occurs at the edge. The center is better by perhaps an order of magnitude. Probably below the ability of the intferogram to measure it.


That's why I used a 3.1 inch (oversize) 1/15 wave secondary for my relay mirror. You hit it exactly!

#18 astroN00B

astroN00B

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 393
  • Joined: 21 Oct 2006

Posted 06 March 2007 - 02:21 PM

Sorry to drag this thread up from the grave, but I have a couple questions. I'm interested in building something like Mr. Bill's scope and would like to know how to calculate the positions of the secondary mirror and focuser. I thought the NEWT software might work. Any ideas... other than eyeballing it?

#19 refractory

refractory

    Apollo

  • *****
  • Posts: 1,338
  • Joined: 05 Feb 2005

Posted 06 March 2007 - 06:40 PM

Something like this- modified for my bino project- might just do the trick. How much does the OTA weigh including focuser?

Jess Tauber

#20 Jeff Morgan

Jeff Morgan

    James Webb Space Telescope

  • *****
  • Posts: 16,243
  • Joined: 28 Sep 2003

Posted 06 March 2007 - 07:17 PM

No problem dragging it up, always an interesting topic. Since this thread went cold I have acquired two lenses for use in this type of project, a 4" f/14 achro and 80mm f/7 APO. The achro will be the easier project, so I have started that one first and should be making sawdust this weekend.

My first step was to purchase PVC pipe and mount the cell and a focuser to verify the focal length. I also noted the focuser position for the eyepiece in my collection that has the most inward focuser travel (a 31 Nagler).

With focal length and the most inside focuser position confirmed I used a drafting program to lay my project out. I could have used paper and pencil too.

First, you want to draw a cone. The base of the cone is equal in size to the aperture of your lens. The height of the cone is equal to the focal length of the lens. When you place the focuser on the drawing, you want to be sure that the vertex (tip) of this cone is in the center of your focuser drawtube travel.

Second, decide how large of an 100% illuminated circle you need at focus. As a visual obersever, I decided that 1/2" was adequate (more than adequate actually). I then drew a 1/2" line centered on the tip of the vertex, and perpendicular to the light path. I then drew lines connecting each end the of the 1/2" line to the base of the cone (representing the objective lens) on the same side. This gives you a somewhat bigger cone with a "snipped" tip. Anything you place in the scope (mirrors and baffles) should be large enough to accomodate the larger cone.

Third, check what size mirror you have available . Lets say for example you choose a 2" minor axis newtonian diagonal. You want to place that mirror in such a way that the light cone doesn't touch the outer edges of the mirror. For my project, I decided that I would not use the outer 0.15" edge. So I placed the mirror at the point where the cone was only 1.7" wide.

Takes much longer to explain than do. Fire up a drawing program and give it a try.

#21 Art Bianconi

Art Bianconi

    Aurora

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,659
  • Joined: 06 Mar 2006

Posted 06 March 2007 - 08:50 PM

Your description of how you placed the secondary was quite clear.

Thanks. It also provided an answer on where to place the focuser draw tube so it accommodates the EP's. My Newtonian's will benefit from that too!

Art

#22 astroN00B

astroN00B

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 393
  • Joined: 21 Oct 2006

Posted 07 March 2007 - 01:33 PM

Sounds fairly simple and close to what I had imagined. Many thanks!

#23 astroN00B

astroN00B

    Ranger 4

  • *****
  • Posts: 393
  • Joined: 21 Oct 2006

Posted 15 March 2007 - 09:47 PM

How is the image oriented in this scope using the secondary mirror and star diagonal in the light path?

I'm serious about building this type of scope and ordered a 127mm f/8 Antares, 2" Antares focuser, and Meade 1.8" secondary from the outlet. Still need a diagonal. I just want to know what I'm in for before bouncing the light an extra time :question:

#24 camvan

camvan

    Mercury-Atlas

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,634
  • Joined: 02 May 2005

Posted 15 March 2007 - 10:37 PM

forgive my ignorance, but are you calling it 'folded', due to the fact it's reflected off the secondary into the focuser/ep?

or is there something more to this than I'm seeing?

#25 alvin58

alvin58

    Vostok 1

  • *****
  • Posts: 157
  • Joined: 15 Apr 2006

Posted 15 March 2007 - 10:52 PM

I myself have just obtained a 5" f/15 Edmund lens along with the March 2001 S&T issue with Ernie Pfannenschmidt's article on folding refractors. Always thought I would like to try and fabricate one so here goes. I do have a couple of hurdles right off the bat as (1.I need to build a cell for this - it has none. Might try the idea from R Berry's book 'Telescopes you can Build and (2.Where to obtain a 1/20 wave 3.1" flat. Should be a great project!


CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. Donation is not required by any means, so please enjoy your stay.


Recent Topics






Cloudy Nights LLC
Cloudy Nights Sponsor: Astronomics