Tracking platform
#1
Posted 26 April 2012 - 09:48 AM
I have a small wood platform I use with my 12.5" and really miss having tracking with the 20" so this will be a welcome addition to the stable....
#2
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:44 AM
#3
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:45 AM
#4
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:09 PM
Nice!! Be sure to post up a review after you've used it. I am interested in hearing your comments. At some point I have to add tracking to my dob - not expecting delivery until July though.
#5
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:16 PM
#6
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:33 PM
I know Alvin was taking the 1st production heavy model to the TSP to demo.....mine is the 2nd one off the line so to speak. I have not heard how it went as yet though.
#7
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:20 PM
#8
Posted 02 May 2012 - 06:13 PM
Let me know your thoughts when you receive your platform.
Clear skies,
Alvin
#9
Posted 02 May 2012 - 07:32 PM
Only issue at the moment is it came with a center bolt that isnt setup for DSC's so I wont be able to test it until I mod the bolt.....
If it tracks as well as its built and as good as it looks then its going to be awesome
Hi,
Let me know your thoughts when you receive your platform.
Clear skies,
Alvin
#10
Posted 03 May 2012 - 08:18 PM
nice job though.
#11
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:07 PM
Edit: seems the moderator cleaned the nasty out of Andrews post so I will do the same with mine
#12
Posted 03 May 2012 - 09:10 PM
To all those getting ready to jump on him: "Let it go".
#13
Posted 04 May 2012 - 01:33 AM
#14
Posted 04 May 2012 - 09:21 AM
This one?.....shipping weight was 22lbs.....While I have yet to put my scope on it I can tell it should should hold my 20 very well without groaning.....I was going to get a servocat because of the bulk and weight of what was available even though goto doesnt excite me. Then Alvin posted about Gregg's new design and it was off to the races for me.
#15
Posted 04 May 2012 - 01:12 PM
The biggest drawback to platforms in my opinion is the weight when it comes to one big enough for a 25" scope....Most weigh in the 50 to 70lb range that I have seen.
This one?.....shipping weight was 22lbs.....While I have yet to put my scope on it I can tell it should should hold my 20 very well without groaning.....I was going to get a servocat because of the bulk and weight of what was available even though goto doesnt excite me. Then Alvin posted about Gregg's new design and it was off to the races for me.
The Atomic Platform weighed 18 lb and it had a 150 lb weight capacity, and it was made of wood. The EquatorialPlatforms compact platform (also wood) can handle a 25" Obsession (weight around 200 lb) and it weighs 35 lb. (They don't give weights on their aluminum ones). These are load ratios of 6:1 to 8:1.
The Blandin platform is aluminum and so should be able to do at least as well with its load ratio.
This review:
http://www.cloudynig...5/o/all/fpart/1
Indicates it carries 120 lb, so if 20 lb is its true (not shipping) weight then it is a 6:1 ratio.
#16
Posted 04 May 2012 - 01:53 PM
As for The TomO stuff.....good stuff but pricy
Blandin is making two versions a medium and a heavy....Mine is the heavy version but that definately refers to capacity and not weight lol Gregg has been using the heavy version with his 200lb 25" for a couple of years. I have not weighed my 20" but I am guessing around 140lbs.....I am guessing here but the shipping weight was 22lbs and there was at least 4lbs of packing material.....so its 18lbs or under. That thread you reference is what led me to placing the order.....
#17
Posted 04 May 2012 - 04:33 PM
Atomic Platforms are not still being made are they?
No, hence the tense I used:
"The Atomic Platform weighed 18 lb and it had a 150 lb weight capacity, and it was made of wood. "
#19
Posted 06 May 2012 - 11:34 AM
Hi Andrew -What's The point of having tracking platform?Just buy servocat and you will be happy.
nice job though.
I have both a GOTO scope and a scope with a tracking platform. The four advantages of the tracking platform are:
1 -you can put it down facing roughly north, put the scope on it, and start observing without needing to do a 2-star alignment.
2 - it's very convenient for star-hopping without needing to release clutches or reset your alignment.
3 - there is no field rotation if you want to photography.
4 - price.
For me, 1 and 2 are the main reasons I like the platform. I do a lot of school star parties for kids in town, and I can be observing and tracking the moon even before the sun sets. In town in Atlanta, it may never get dark enough to see enough stars to do a good 2-star alignment, and by the time it does, half the kids have left to go home. I also enjoy star-hopping with my Portaball, and a platform is the only way to get tracking on that.
Of course, the disadvantage is you don't get GOTO - you have to star hop. For a normal dob, you could add DSC's and do push-to if you want, but not for the P-ball.
So it depends on what you want to do. For me, its the only way to get tracking on the Portaball, and the convenience and quick set up are a bonus that I happen to really appreciate. Since I enjoy star-hopping, the lack of GOTO isn't a big deal. If you really want the GOTO, then a servocat or other drive system is the better choice.
Jarad
#20
Posted 07 May 2012 - 09:53 AM
#21
Posted 07 May 2012 - 04:46 PM
I think Push-To is actually better than Go-To because there are less things that go "break" in the night. The less things to go wrong, the better. Plus the low battery consumption of a platform and simple Push-To DSCs. No need to have heavy lead-acid batteries and recharge everything daily at a Star Party.
#22
Posted 08 May 2012 - 04:11 PM
#23
Posted 08 May 2012 - 05:13 PM
#24
Posted 08 May 2012 - 05:59 PM
I am with you Gregg.... I find I spend more time observing and less time waiting for the goto to actually goto also.
I agree and can get an object in the field really fast with my DSC system, it's very simple. I am big into simplicity. I repair things for a living, but I'd rather not have it be part of my hobby. Who wants to be fixing and fiddling with things in the dark, when you're tired? Everything you add: every motor, every clutch, every circuit, etc. is another point of failure.
#25
Posted 09 May 2012 - 04:34 AM