Vintage and Classic Binoculars discussion (Part 2)
#251
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:30 AM
It is very difficult to see the field stops with the eye cups installed.
#253
Posted 10 May 2012 - 02:10 PM
Thank you
Allan
#254
Posted 10 May 2012 - 05:38 PM
It is just sometimes I have the pedantic habit of explaining of how to make a clock when someone asks simply "what time it is" .
It comes from being a teacher, I guess.
Glad of being helpful.
Marco
#255
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:20 PM
That binocular is probably the same as a former neighbor used, when we were looking for a bright comet, twenty five years, ago, in Brooklyn. I recall that it was a Universal Camera 6x30 USN glass. I own a similar US Marine Corps binocular.
Incidentally, Universal Camera made some unique cameras, including the half frame Mercury, before WW II.
Happy collecting,
Arthur Pinewood
#256
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:47 PM
accomodation means bolig = housing in my language, and gives no sense to me, are you always so short in words ? :O)
but thank you anyway for your explanation.
Allan”
Dear Allan:
I am sorry; I have been very busy. I am also sorry that you are probably not a native English speaker. If you were, I would have a wonderful time beating that college Pu . . . I mean, honored PhD—who never writes me anymore—Marco like the proverbial “red-headed stepchild.”
But, I won’t; I’ll just think it.
Anyway, the particular accommodation I was peaking of was one noticed by Jae.
With the greed for dollars going up, as the consumer knowledge of what makes a good instrument going down, many manufacturers are simply pumping stuff out the door without the concern for collimation that once ruled the industry. As one corporate head told his national sales team: “Binoculars are not to look through; they’re to sell!”
One of the reasons I tried so hard to get a thread going on creating a new, light-weight, inexpensive system of 3-axes collimation was so amateurs could address these issues. However, after 4 attempts to stay on track, I’ve given up.
Cheers,
BillC . . . humbug, bah!
#257
Posted 11 May 2012 - 03:50 AM
What you write this time, gives me a reason to actually like my old timers binuculars even more...counting 2 NVA`s 7x40, one IOR Valdada 7x40, and a terrific BPO Baigish 7x30.
Thanks for your input dear curmudgeon=gnavpot
Allan
#258
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:53 AM
I like that
Red headed? I wish...
I am only white now.
Marco
#259
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:18 PM
Marco"
That's why I said "LIKE."
"Like" is a wonderful word; if you (like) took it (like) from today's (like) vernacular, (like) many of our citizens couldn't (like) communicate!
Bill
#260
Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:06 AM
Field of view is narrow, though central image is pin sharp and bright. The image does seem to soften somewhat towards the field-stops , something a narrow field binocular should not portray.
Matching the date of this binocular through its serial number is difficult, but this model was manufactured between 1932 and 1962 , when in 1954 it sold for $162 and in 1961 $235 !
#261
Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:31 AM
Steve
#262
Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:05 AM
#263
Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:21 AM
Are Leitz part of Leica in any way?
#264
Posted 14 May 2012 - 10:52 AM
I'm not Simon . . . I just play him on TV.
BillC
#265
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:12 PM
Then Kern company Switzerland is implemented into Leica as well, to my knowledge...just bought two bin`s from there, one named Kern Arau, and the other Leica...both alike, with no visible changes to see,after the takeover, - but the 1064nm laser filters, and the reticle annoyes me a little, becouse of a brownish mis-colouring inside the tubes, for which i blame the filters to do, but it`s only my guess though. Otherwise they are both fine glasses, and very handy in size.
#266
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:28 PM
Hello Alsendk,Are Leitz part of Leica in any way?
Ernst Leitz was an optical firm, owned by Leitz family. Formerly, they were the second largest manufacturer of microscopes in Germany. In 1914, one of their mechanics developed a camera using 35 mm film. By 1924, the camera was produced by Leitz, using the name Leica [LEitz CAmera].
There are three different firms formed from the Leitz corporation, all using the Leica name: sports optics, including cameras; microscopes and geo measuring devices. If I recall, before the firm was reorganized, the sports optics division started using the Leica brand name.
Happy collecting,
Arthur Pinewood
#267
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:41 PM
Especially the Leica cameras was my boyish hope to purchase some day, in order to shoot pictures like Bresson and Eisenstaedt and Capa....now in the digital age, it appears to be of less importance which camera you have, I believe?
still the Leica X1 looks so good and effective...very off
topic btw :O(
#268
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:25 PM
Especially the Leica cameras was my boyish hope to purchase some day, in order to shoot pictures like Bresson and Eisenstaedt and Capa....now in the digital age, it appears to be of less importance which camera you have, I believe?
still the Leica X1 looks so good and effective...very off
topic btw :O(
Hello Alsendk,
It was my boyish ambition, as well. I purchased in a 1938 Leica, in 1963, which I still own. I also managed to meet Eisenstadt.
I suspect that the imaging device on digital cameras are incapable of realizing the resolution capable of the best lenses.
Incidentally, Leitz was making prismatic binoculars by 1914, but far fewer than Zeiss. The Leitz 7x50 Marsept and Marseptit binoculars are very highly regarded, although their coatings are rather out of date. I bought one, in 1979.
Happy collecting,
Arthur
#270
Posted 17 May 2012 - 11:23 AM
Does it respond to being called "Norman" by any chance?
#271
Posted 17 May 2012 - 12:46 PM
What do you think it is Kenny?
#275
Posted 18 May 2012 - 10:28 AM