Red Hot New Concept OTA's
#26
Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:11 AM
#27
Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:14 AM
you are absolutely right. This concept is not needed for small sized refractor. This is why we will offer these only for the following apertures: 150, 160, 180, 204, 220, 250mm. Bigger you go, more benefit there is to gain, especially if you combine with R30 SLIM lenses (weight cut down by 40 percent on average)
cheers,
Ales
#28
Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:21 AM
#29
Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:30 AM
Even if I prefer the look of traditional refractors, the weight reduction is a great advantage.
How about the prices vs original models ?
#30
Posted 11 January 2013 - 07:50 AM
First one of these new TCR style scopes (Truss Construction Refractor)is already listed with price.
Perhaps I'm being blind. On which page is the price?
Nevermind. It's on http://istar-optical.com/istar_009.htm . $2177 for 6" f/12 achromat, about $300 more than the 'tubed' version.
#31
Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:02 AM
#32
Posted 11 January 2013 - 09:13 AM
#33
Posted 11 January 2013 - 10:57 AM
Nice looking scope, may change the definition of a 1000mm f10 to a "GrabnGo".....
#34
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:06 AM
#35
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:13 AM
Brendan
#36
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:31 AM
All will be introduced one by one during 2013.
regards,
Ales
will you bring any to NEAF?
#37
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:31 AM
thank you so much for your wonderful comment. I truly appreciate that from someone like yourself.
respectfully,
Ales
#38
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:37 AM
we will definitely bring these to NEAF.. and hopefuly more than just one. By that time we should have the 180 and 204mm versions available too to demonstrate that even 8" refractor no longer requres an expensive mount and can be handled by one man. For sure we will have at least this 6" F12 there...
best regards,
Ales
#39
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:46 AM
at this moment we can offer these with some 15 percent increase over the standard models. But we are working hard on narrowing this gap as much as we possibly can. I want anyone who can afford the traditional design scope to be able to afford this TCR low weight variation.
Cheers,
Ales
#40
Posted 11 January 2013 - 11:54 AM
#41
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:14 PM
#42
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:31 PM
-Tim.
#43
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:34 PM
Perhaps installing a fan would help?
-Tim.
#44
Posted 11 January 2013 - 12:48 PM
Keith Lawson won a Merit Award at RTMC in 2010 for an open tube refractor he'd built.
Cool pics Tim, thanks.
#45
Posted 11 January 2013 - 03:44 PM
Im aware of this rail scope. This consruction is known and Keith made a superb job putting this thingn together. He used Istar 204 F8,8 achromatic doublet if I remember correctly. Thank you so much for sharing!!
cheers,
Ales
#46
Posted 11 January 2013 - 03:54 PM
#47
Posted 11 January 2013 - 04:29 PM
Ales that is what I was talking about earlier, I like Keith's short dewshield/back extension offering protection for the lens as well as shielding stray light.Dear Tim,
Im aware of this rail scope. This consruction is known and Keith made a superb job putting this thingn together. He used Istar 204 F8,8 achromatic doublet if I remember correctly. Thank you so much for sharing!!
cheers,
Ales
#48
Posted 11 January 2013 - 05:56 PM
#49
Posted 12 January 2013 - 06:41 AM
this is exactly what we have planned for the dew shield construction. We are looking into two versions so give us some tim to experiment and decide. The bottom line is that if anyone buys one of these TCR scopes, they will be given a choice of a dew shield later on this year, I suspect second half of 2013, possibly sooner.
#50
Posted 12 January 2013 - 08:16 AM
I once tried to make a prettier dewcap from some soft, thin bubble foam plastic. I thought it was going to be perfect, as it was longer than the newspaper tube, but imagine my surprise, when the scope often dewed up, when it never did so with the old newspaper tube!
So, bad news (on print) can be good for something allright!
Clear skies!
Thomas, Denmark