Any other mounts besides a parallelogram?
#26
Posted 10 January 2013 - 03:56 PM
#27
Posted 10 January 2013 - 11:41 PM
#28
Posted 12 January 2013 - 07:26 AM
http://www.bhphotovi...3_Magic_Arm_...
It states load capacity is 6.6 lbs
#29
Posted 12 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
I notice the add mentions 6.6 lbs capacity. The clamp is labeled 15kg and it makes sense the arm itself may be limited to 6.6 lbs tho it is not labeled. Unfortunately, I do not have the documentation for the magic arm itself.
#30
Posted 12 January 2013 - 10:42 AM
http://www.manfrotto...rm-with-bracket
http://www.manfrotto...ion-super-clamp
Rich
#31
Posted 12 January 2013 - 02:35 PM
#32
Posted 12 January 2013 - 03:02 PM
#33
Posted 12 January 2013 - 04:23 PM
I use a common Manfrotto ball head rated for 8.8# with my tall Giottos monopod and it works well with binos up to 5 lbs. I find a tall monopod with a ball head is ideal for minimalist-style stabilizing of 10x-12x binos; you can use it standing or seated. Heavier, higher mag. 16x70 binos are still fine for terrestrial use on my monopod but are on the edge of being a little shaky for astro use, IMO.
Rich
#34
Posted 12 January 2013 - 04:43 PM
#35
Posted 12 January 2013 - 04:52 PM
#36
Posted 12 January 2013 - 05:28 PM
#37
Posted 12 January 2013 - 05:37 PM
#38
Posted 12 January 2013 - 11:41 PM
#39
Posted 13 January 2013 - 05:00 PM
#40
Posted 14 January 2013 - 10:15 PM
The Manfrotto magic arm and my zero gravity chair work pretty well for me.
I already have the anti-gravity chair and binos. What Manfrotto magic parts woulc I need to order to make a system like yours? I have up to 15x63 with horizontal mount, and much heavier 25x100 with vertical mount. Would it be able to handle the latter, or just the smaller stuff?
#41
Posted 15 January 2013 - 09:06 AM
#42
Posted 15 January 2013 - 03:33 PM
http://www.bhphotovi...43A_Magic_Ar...
http://www.bhphotovi...clamp&N=0&In...
http://www.bhphotovi...inocular_Tri...
#44
Posted 15 January 2013 - 06:02 PM
#45
Posted 16 January 2013 - 10:44 PM
#46
Posted 18 January 2013 - 10:54 AM
#47
Posted 18 January 2013 - 03:16 PM
#48
Posted 18 January 2013 - 04:30 PM
#49
Posted 18 January 2013 - 04:50 PM
#50
Posted 19 January 2013 - 01:54 AM
Please let us know how they work out for you SMark.
Well, I have to say I really like it. It does take a bit of getting used to with regard to getting the positioning just right and all, but that's pretty much all it is. Once acclimated to the mechanics of it all it's pretty easy to adjust and position everything correctly the fist time. I first tried it with my 16x80 and it worked great.
I will say this though, that heartbeat thang is a bit annoying. I'll try using more cushion behind me and see if that tames things a bit. It becomes a big deal when viewing Jupiter because the planet will obviously bounce with each heartbeat. But when I moved over to M45 and then M42 it didn't seem to be as noticeable.
Though I did find a way to make it go away entirely... I attached my Canon IS binoculars to it instead. I tried all three... The 10x42, the 15x50, and the 18x50 (recently acquired) and in each case it was as steady as staring at a painting on the wall from 5 feet away. Yeah, rock-steady. I could get used to that real fast. Nothing like sitting comfortably in a chair with your head and neck supported and looking at rock-steady views of the heavens...
So I'm really happy with it. It might be fun to build something like a Dobsonian platform of sorts to set the zero gravity chair onto, with a couple handles attached to the base to give a bit of left-to-right movement when needed. Something to think about anyway. Something like that could keep you from ever having to get up and reposition the chair.