You ever go to the Reflector forum by mistake?
#1
Posted 13 November 2012 - 09:09 PM
#2
Posted 13 November 2012 - 09:15 PM
#3
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:22 PM
Like anybody can really see that stuff.
#4
Posted 13 November 2012 - 10:42 PM
#5
Posted 13 November 2012 - 11:09 PM
#6
Posted 14 November 2012 - 12:16 AM
- Jim
#7
Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:21 AM
Isn't that a bit like not paying attention and walking into the ladies' room by mistake?
- Jim
Well...
Close but not quite. It's like going into the Boy's room instead of the Men's room...
Jon
#8
Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:49 AM
Oh yeah, and you have to use a ladder to see anything good.
#9
Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:52 AM
Isn't that a bit like not paying attention and walking into the ladies' room by mistake?
- Jim
By mistake! ... yea right!
#10
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:04 AM
Ed D
#11
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:23 AM
I knew there was a reason why I own one reflector and one refractor.
Ed D
I suspect those of us who are happy members of both tribes enjoy the best of both worlds. 'Tis the ideal setup IMHO. However, in my case I do own two refractors and one reflector.
#12
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:35 AM
Rex
#13
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:47 AM
And they even do "planetary" stuff, like mapping clouds on Uranus and looking for Pluto.It's really weird there. They talk about seeing Stephan's Quintet and the Horsehead Nebula.
Like anybody can really see that stuff.
Seriously, y'all are welcome on the reflector forum. We're not against tiny 'scopes.
#14
Posted 14 November 2012 - 09:56 AM
It's really weird there. They talk about seeing Stephan's Quintet and the Horsehead Nebula.
Like anybody can really see that stuff.
Sure you can! With a good refractor and $10k worth of mount and imaging gear.
or
with a 12+ reflector, dark skies, and your own eyes.
#15
Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:52 AM
But for a lot less moolah you can go visual on the HH with a reflector.
As one of those who use both, I agree very much with Jon, who states repeatedly that they are complimentary instruments
Of course, if you have enough moolah, you can build a 36" refractor and house it with its own tracking mount and observatory, which will surely knock the socks off a 36" reflector!
#16
Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:25 AM
#17
Posted 14 November 2012 - 02:55 PM
#18
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:28 PM
#19
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:35 PM
And they even do "planetary" stuff, like mapping clouds on Uranus and looking for Pluto.It's really weird there. They talk about seeing Stephan's Quintet and the Horsehead Nebula.
Like anybody can really see that stuff.
Seriously, y'all are welcome on the reflector forum. We're not against tiny 'scopes.
Good one. Kind of amusing visiting the refractor forum. Your always telling yourselves how much you like and even love your scopes. Feels like an inferiority thing to me
That said I've just ordered a TEC140.
#20
Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:35 PM
The ultimate insult is to find the refractor that you love dearly being used as a finder scope on some guys 24" Newt.
You mean like this 6 inch refractor finder on a 30 inch dob (with my 80mm in the background )
#21
Posted 14 November 2012 - 04:08 PM
Compared to monster reflectors, even the most lovely 6 inch refractor is but a toy. A nice toy for sure but still a pea stick compared to those scary monster reflectors.
#22
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:16 PM
#23
Posted 14 November 2012 - 05:20 PM
That's just the taste of "aperture is king" flavored kool-aid.
- Jim
#24
Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:14 PM
Better get back to the :dob: forum...
#25
Posted 14 November 2012 - 11:36 PM